|
![]()
|
Histologic
Type |
Frequency
(%) |
5-year
Survival (%) |
Infiltrating
Ductal Carcinoma |
63.6
|
79
|
Infiltrating
Lobular Carcinoma |
5.9
|
84
|
Infiltrating
Ductal & Lobular Carcinoma |
1.6
|
85
|
Medullary
Carcinoma |
2.8
|
82
|
Mucinous
(colloid) Carcinoma |
2.1
|
95
|
Comedocarcinoma
|
1.4
|
87
|
Paget's
Disease |
1.0
|
79
|
Papillary
Carcinoma |
0.8
|
96
|
Tubular
Carcinoma |
0.6
|
96
|
Adenocarcinoma,
NOS |
7.5
|
65
|
Carcinoma,
NOS |
3.5
|
62
|
Histologic
Type |
Frequency
(%) |
5-year
Survival (%) |
Intraductal
Carcinoma |
3.6
|
>99
|
Lobular
Carcinoma in situ (LCIS) |
1.6
|
>99
|
Intraductal
& LCIS |
0.2
|
>99
|
Papillary
Carcinoma |
0.4
|
>99
|
Comedocarcinoma
|
0.3
|
>99
|
Features
of these carcinomas is discussed with the images shown below:
1.
Atypical
epithelial hyperplasia
4.
Lobular
carcinoma in situ (LCIS)
6.
Infiltrating
ductal carcinoma
7.
Infiltrating
ductal carcinoma
8.
Infiltrating
ductal carcinoma
9.
Infiltrating
lobular carcinoma
10.
Infiltrating
lobular carcinoma
17.
Metaplastic
breast carcinoma
The
hormone receptor status of the breast cancer cells can be useful
information for treatment and prognosis. The neoplastic cells can
express a variety of receptors. The presence of these receptors can
provide a means for controlling cell growth through chemotherapeutic
agents.
In
general, cancers in which the cells express estrogen receptor (ER) in
their nuclei will have a better prognosis. This is because such
positive neoplastic cells are better differentiated, and they can
respond to hormonal manipulation. The drug tamoxifen is often utilized
for this purpose. Almost three-fourths of breast cancers expressing ER
will respond to this therapy, whereas less than 5% not expressing ER
will respond.
The
significance of progesterone receptor (PR) positivity in a breast
carcinoma is less well understood. In general, cancers that are ER
positive will also be PR positive. However, carcinomas that are PR
positive, but not ER positive, may have a worse prognosis.
There
are other markers that can be identified in breast carcinomas. One
important marker for breast cancer is C-erb B2 (HER2-neu), and it is
identified by staining around the cytoplasmic membrane of the cells.
There is a correlation between HER2 (C-erb B2) positivity and high
nuclear grade and aneuploidy, and a specific drug (trastuzumab) is
available as a therapeutic option with HER2 positive carcinomas.
Another marker is cathepsin D, an acidic lysosomal protease that can
be found in the cytoplasm of breast carcinoma cells, and it is also
found in the stroma between the cells. There is a correlation between
cathepsin D positivity and presence of metastases (particularly lymph
nodes). Non-ductal carcinomas (a minority of breast cancers) are more
likely to stain with Cathepsin D.
1.
Estrogen
receptor positivity
2.
Progesterone
receptor positivity
The
amount of DNA contained in the nuclei of breast carcinoma cells will
provide an indication of their malignant potential. Flow cytometry is
a means for measuring the amount of DNA. Normal cells, or those of a
benign neoplasm, tend to have a single homogenous population of cells
with a "euploid" DNA content. However, malignant cells are
less differentiated and have abnormal expression of DNA content. This
is measurable as the degree of "aneuploidy" by flow
cytometry. The prognosis is worse for carcinomas with a greater degree
of cellular aneuploidy.
1.
Breast
cancer analyzed by flow cytometry
One
of the best methods for detection of breast abnormalities is
self-examination. In women of reproductive age, this is best carried
out just after menstruation as a new menstrual cycle is beginning.
Thorough self-examination on a regular basis will bring attention to
any changes that may occur, as a woman can become familiar with the
normal appearance of her breasts on palpation. Breast examination is
part of a routine physical examination performed by a physician or
other health care worker. However, a breast cancer may have been
present for 5 to 10 years before reaching a size (about 1 cm) that is
detectable by palpation.
The
location of breast cancers is as follows:
·
Upper outer
quadrant: 50%
·
Central
area: 20%
·
Lower outer
quadrant: 10%
·
Upper inner
quadrant: 10%
·
Lower inner
quadrant: 10%
The
most sensitive and specific method to detect breast cancer is
mammography. This procedure is performed by compressing each breast
between metal plates and producing an image of the breast on a
radiographic film. The film is then examined by a radiologist for any
abnormalities. Current mammographic methods employ very small amounts
of radiation, which cumulatively are not enough to be a hazard even
with yearly mammographic examinations. If a palpable "lump"
is present, then diagnostic mammography can aid in defining and
localizing it. However, mammography can detect masses that are not
palpable, because carcinomas generally have a density greater than the
surrounding breast tissue. The presence of breast implants makes it
difficult to see lesions in the breast mammographically.
Mammography
is optimally performed when the woman has no cyclic breast tenderness
or other conditions that would increase breast density. There is no
consensus as to recommendations for use of routine mammographic
screening; the patient and her physician can decide what is needed
based upon individual circumstances. A screening mammogram for
asymptomatic women includes standard views of both breasts. The major
purpose of a screening mammogram is to separate normal from abnormal
findings and to identify patients who need further evaluation. The
films can be compared to previous films, if available. If the patient
has an abnormal screening mammogram or signs and symptoms of a breast
abnormality, then a diagnostic mammogram is performed.
Following
detection of an abnormality by palpation and/or by mammography, a
tissue sample can be obtained. For small lumps that are not clearly
cancers, a procedure called "fine needle aspiration" or FNA
is performed. The physician performing an FNA will guide a thin
needle, under local anesthetic, into the breast to the location of the
abnormality. Then, cells are aspirated into the needle with several
passes through the abnormal area. The cells are placed on glass
slides, stained to highlight the cells, and then examined by a
cytopathologist. The cytopathologist tries to determine if malignant
cells are present. In general, false positive diagnoses (a lesion is
called cancer, but in reality is not) are rare. However, with this
technique, false negative diagnoses (in which a cancer may be missed)
are possible some of the time, because of sampling error or the small
number of cells examined or the nature of the lesion.
Breast
biopsy is performed to remove a lesion and make a definitive
diagnosis, if a malignancy has not been demonstrated by FNA but is
still suspected, or if a lump is likely to be malignant. Such a biopsy
can be done under local or general anesthesia. The biopsy can also be
directed radiographically by placing a needle and/or colored dye into
the area that is abnormal. The biopsy can be examined by frozen
section by the pathologist for a quick, preliminary diagnosis. More
commonly, the biopsy is processed routinely, and a diagnosis is made.
If a malignancy is found, the biopsy can be further studied via
immunoperoxidase staining to determine receptor status.
A
completely uniform system of grading for breast cancers is not
possible because of the wide variety of histologic cell types. The
cell types themselves, along with the invasiveness of the cancer, help
to predict the biologic behavior of the cancer. A grading system (a
modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson system) outlined below utilizes
histologic characteristics of the breast carcinoma.
Tubule
Formation (% of carcinoma composed of tubular structures)
|
Score
|
>75%
|
1
|
10-75%
|
2
|
less
than 10% |
3
|
Nuclear
Pleomorphism
|
Score
|
Small,
uniform cells |
1
|
Moderate
increase in size and variation |
2
|
Marked
variation |
3
|
Mitotic
Count (per 10 high power fields) |
Score
|
Up
to 7 |
1
|
8
to 14 |
2
|
15
or more |
3
|
The
grade is calculated by adding the above scores. The grade correlates
with survival as follows:
Grade
|
Score
|
5-year
Survival (%) |
7-year
Survival (%) |
1
|
3
to 5 |
95
|
90
|
2
|
6
or 7 |
75
|
65
|
3
|
8
or 9 |
50
|
45
|
Carcinomas
have a propensity to spread via lymphatics. Breast cancers, when they
metastasize, often go first to the axillary lymph nodes where most
lymphatics from the breast drain. Spread of carcinoma to the dermal
lymphatics produces a so-called "inflammatory carcinoma"
which is a descriptive term, not a histologic type. This term arose
from the grossly red to orange and firm, indurated appearance of such
a lesion. More distant metastases are also possible. Supraclavicular
lymph nodes can be involved. Other organs can be sites of metastases,
and such sites as lung, bone, and liver are more common.
The
least aggressive cancers--ones that rarely metastasize outside of the
breast--histologically are: non-invasive intraductal and lobular
carcinoma in situ. Carcinomas which can potentially metastasize but
less commonly do so are: colloid carcinoma, medullary carcinoma (when
a lymphoid stroma is present), and papillary carcinoma. All other
cancers have a greater potential to metastasize than those listed
above.
The
stage of a breast cancer is based upon its size and degree of spread.
The staging system goes from stage I to stage IV as follows:
Stage
|
Definition
|
5-year
Survival (%) |
7-year
Survival (%) |
I
|
Tumor
2 cm or less in greatest diameter and without evidence of
regional (nodal) or distant spread |
96
|
92
|
II
|
Tumor
more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension,
with regional lymph node involvement but without distant
metastases, OR > a tumor of more than 5 cm in diameter
without regional (nodal) and distant spread |
81
|
71
|
III
|
Tumors
of any size with possible skin involvement, pectoral and chest
wall fixation, and axillary or internal mammary nodal
involvement, fixed, but without distant metastases |
52
|
39
|
IV
|
Tumor
of any size with or without regional spread but with evidence of
distant metastases |
18
|
11
|
Treatment
of breast cancer can take a variety of forms, depending upon the grade
and stage of the cancer as well as the overall health of the patient
and the wishes of the patient. Therapy needs to be appropriate for
each individual woman.
At
a minimum, a localized carcinoma can be removed completely with local
excision (lumpectomy) with margins free of tumor. This is termed
"breast conserving surgery" (BCS). At the same time sampling
of axillary lymph nodes can be done to determine if lymph node
metastases are present. A total mastectomy with removal of the breast
can be performed. The survival following BCS is generally as good as
for total mastectomy, other factors being equal.
Surgical
procedures may be combined with radiation therapy and or chemotherapy,
depending upon the type of cancer present and hormone receptor status.
Radiation, coupled with BCS, may help to reduce the incidence of a
second cancer in the breast when intraductal carcinoma is diagnosed.
More extensive cancers may be treated with a modified radical
mastectomy with removal of the entire breast and axillary lymph nodes.
Some breast carcinomas that have a higher stage may be amenable to
more aggressive chemotherapy which can be coupled with total body
radiation and bone marrow transplantation.
Prognosis
cannot be completely predicted. There are some general guidelines as
to the potential biologic behavior of a breast carcinoma. In general,
a better prognosis will accompany cancers:
·
Less than 2
cm in size
·
Without
axillary lymph node involvement
·
That are
non-invasive ductal carcinoma and LCIS
·
With ER and
PR positivity
·
Which lack
of aneuploidy
Barnes
DM, Harris WH, Smith P, Millis RR, Rubens RD. Immunohistochemical
determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods
of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of
breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:1445-1551
Berg
JW, Hutter RVP. Breast Cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:257-269.
Camplejohn
RS, Ash CM, Gillett CE, et al. The prognostic significance of DNA flow
cytometry in breast cancer: results from 881 patients treated in a
single centre. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:140-145.
Cannon-Albright
LA, Skolnick MH. The genetics of familial breast cancer. Semin Oncol.
1996;23:1-5.
Elston
CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic faxtors in breast cancer. I. The
value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large
study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403-410.
Fisher
B, Costantino J, Redmond C, et al. Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy
and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1581-1586.
Frierson
HF Jr. Grade and flow cytometric analysis of ploidy for infiltrating
ductal carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:24-29.
Hedley
DW. DNS Cytometry Consensus Conference. DNA flow cytometry and breast
cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;28:51-53.
Henson
DE, Ries LA, Carriaga MT. Conditional survival of 56,268 patients with
breast cancer. Cancer. 1995;76:237-242.
Hitchcock
A, Hunt CM, Locker A, et al. A one year audit of fine needle
aspiration cytology for the pre-operative diagnosis of breast disease.
Cytopathology. 1991;2:167-176.
King
SE, Schottenfeld D. The "epidemic" of breast cancer in the
U.S.--determining the factors. Oncology. 1996;10:453-462, 464,
470-472.
Lee-Feldstein
A, Anton-Culver H, Feldstein PJ. Treatment differences and other
prognostic factors realted to breast cancer survival. JAMA.
1994;271:1163-1168.
Leitch
AM. Controversies in breast cancer screening. Cancer. 1995;76(10
Suppl):2064-2069.
Peto
J, Easton DF, Matthews FE, Ford D, Swerdlow AJ. Cancer mortality in
relatives of women with breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1996;65:275-283.
Pichon
MF, Broet P, Magdelenat H, et al. Prognostic value of steroid
receptors after long-term follow-up of 2257 operable breast cancers.
Br J Cancer. 1996;73:1545-1551.
Robbins
P, Pinder S, deKlerk N, et al. Histological grading of breast
carcinomas: a study of interobserver variation. Hum Pathol.
1995;26:873-879.
Steinberg
JL, Trudeau ME, Ryder DE, et al. Combined fine-needle aspiration,
physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable
breast masses: teir relation to outcome for women with primary breast
cancer. Can J Surg. 1996;39:302-311.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUESTIONS: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24-25 , EXAM MENU
Thompson JE, Forlenza S, Verna R. Amoebic liver abscess: a therapeutic approach. Rev Infect Dis
Back to ZAMEL Topics [Home] [About Us] [e-Library] [Projects] [What's New] [Evaluation] [SEN][Medical Links] [Send Cards][News][Music] Return to the tutorial menu. |
||||
|