|
42.4
Chemotherapy of cancer JAMES
CARMICHAEL INTRODUCTION The
term cancer is used to describe a multitude of diseases, all of which are
linked by loss of control of normal growth and replication of cells. It is
a major cause of death worldwide, although it is proportionately more
common in developed countries. Globally, approximately 10 per cent of
deaths are caused by malignant diseases, but in the United Kingdom and the
United States of America, these diseases account for approximately 20 per
cent of deaths. Approximately 6 million new cases of cancer develop each
year, causing some 4 million deaths annually. As populations become older
this figure is likely to increase as the treatment of infections and
cardiac diseases improves. There
is great variability in the incidence of different types of cancer between
countries, and also between ethnic populations within those countries
(Figs 1–3) 2776,2777,2778. Recently there has been an
increase in the incidence of carcinoma of the prostate and cervix, with a
steady decline in the incidence of other cancers such as gastric cancer. In
developed countries incidence of lung cancer is still increasing in women,
but appears to be stable in men; this is closely correlated with smoking
habits. However, in third-world countries the incidence continues to
increase. Despite
wide variations in cancer incidence, it is still difficult to identify
local environmental factors important in the aetiology of these
differences, largely due to the long latency associated with many forms of
cancer. If
diagnosed early many cancers, particularly tumours such as skin cancers,
can be cured by local treatment such as surgery or radiotherapy. However,
the majority of solid malignant tumours are not curable by local measures
alone. This is due to either local invasion or dissemination of the tumour
via the lymphatics or blood. Dissemination via the bloodstream can give
rise to patterns of metastatic disease which are diagnostic of particular
tumour types. The
mechanisms underlying variability in metastatic patterns are poorly
understood at present, although multiple factors are probably involved.
The pattern of venous drainage is important: e.g. dissemination of
colorectal carcinoma via the portal veins leads to a high incidence of
liver metastases. Alternatively, tumour cell types show differences in the
expression of surface molecules such as intercellular adhesion
molecule–1; this important factor affects metastatic potential
in malignant melanoma. The local extracellular millieu at the site of
metastases may also be important, with detectable differences in
expression of many growth factors produced by normal and malignant cells.
Differences in expression of these growth factors may be important for the
establishment of metastases and for subsequent stimulation of tumour cell
growth. COMBINED
MODALITY TREATMENT The
successful treatment of a patient with cancer involves close co-operation
between surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists,
general practitioners, nurses, and support care workers, including
clinical psychologists. The
role of the surgeon is central to this. Obtaining tissue for adequate
histological analysis and identification of patients who can be cured by
resection is a major component of management. Apart from curative
resection of primary tumours, excision of secondary deposits can also
offer long-term disease control. This paradigm is exemplified in the
management of patients with colorectal cancer, in whom resection of
isolated hepatic or pulmonary metastases is of proven value in a subgroup
of patients. A similar situation arises with local recurrences or
pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcomas, resection of which can
result in long-term disease control. Appropriate
debulking improves the outlook in women with ovarian carcinoma: increased
response rates to chemotherapy and prolonged response duration are
achieved following debulking to less than 2 cm (or preferably less than 1
cm) in diameter. Likewise, adequate debulking of residual masses following
induction chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell malignancy has led to
improvements in overall survival in patients with high bulk disease.
Surgery is also a valuable option for the palliative treatment of many
patients with advanced cancer. Defunctioning colostomy or bypass
operations in patients with potentially obstructive lesions of the bowel,
or the palliative resection of fungating lesions eroding through the skin,
can be of great benefit. In
order to increase our knowledge of the biology of malignant diseases,
close links must be developed between surgeons, medical oncologists, and
research scientists. High-quality fresh normal tissue and tumour tissue
are necessary for laboratory analysis and research. Ultimately differences
between normal and malignant tissue could be identified which may lead to
the development of novel and more selective anticancer agents. PRINCIPLES
OF SYSTEMIC MANAGEMENT A
number of systemic approaches are used to treat advanced cancer. These
include chemotherapy and hormone therapy, and there has been a recent
resurgence of interest in immunomodulation with cytokines such as
interferons and interleukins. The
decision to treat any individual patient with systemic therapy is based on
a number of factors (Table 1)
676. Assessment
of tumour Histology Detailed
histological evaluation of every tumour is mandatory and gives valuable
information relevant to the choice of treatment and the overall prognosis.
The response rate of different tumours to chemotherapy varies widely
(Table 2) 677. Some cancers have high response rates, and cure is
frequently possible (such as germ cell malignancies and Hodgkin's
lymphoma); others, such as colorectal carcinoma and melanoma are highly
refractory to chemotherapy, with low response rates, few remissions, and
no cures. However, good palliation can sometimes be achieved in the
absence of an objective response. Grade Histological
grade is important; high-grade or anaplastic tumours have a higher
proportion of cells in cycle, and when untreated they have a poorer
prognosis than slowly growing tumours. Conversely, high-grade tumours
frequently respond better to chemotherapy. Patients with low grade
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma exhibit a continuing relapse pattern, only 20 to 25
per cent being disease free at 5 years. In contrast, aggressive
combination chemotherapy regimens such as MACOP-B and ProMACE-CytaBOM have
been reported to achieve complete response rates in the region of 80 per
cent in patients with high-grade disease. Many of these patients remain in
remission for more than 2 years. Staging It
is important to establish the site and extent of the tumour. Staging
investigations are helpful in determining the most appropriate treatment
plan and also give valuable information on prognosis. Tumour staging is
normally expressed using the TNM system, as described in the UICC
classification of malignant tumours. Tumour bulk itself may affect
response to treatment. In patients with testicular teratoma, response
rates to combination chemotherapy of between 80 and 90 per cent can be
achieved overall, but the response rate of patients with bulky disease is
reduced, with less than 60 per cent achieving complete remission. Assessment
of the patient Performance
status Age
is important in the choice of systematic treatment, particularly in view
of the increased likelihood of drug toxicity occurring in elderly
patients. The general condition of the patient is also a major factor:
there is decreased overall benefit and increased toxicity of chemotherapy
in patients in poor general condition. A number of scales are used to
assess the general condition of patients: the UICC version is simple and
easy (Table 3) 678. Hepatic
and renal function Many
cytotoxic drugs are metabolized via cytochrome p-450 dependent-reactions
in the liver, and disorders of hepatic function can result in either loss
of efficacy or enhanced toxicity. Cyclophosphamide is inert in its
parental form, but it is metabolized by the liver to the active metabolite
4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. The liver is also important in the
detoxification of drugs, hyperbilirubinaemia leading to increased
anthracycline toxicity due to impaired detoxification. Abnormalities in
renal function are also important, causing delayed excretion of drugs and
their major metabolites, and resulting in increased toxicity, as is seen
with methotrexate and carboplatin. Bone
marrow function Abnormalities
of the blood count can indicate bone marrow infiltration. Chemotherapy in
patients with bone marrow infiltration can induce profound bone marrow
depression, which could result in life-threatening sepsis. Modification of
the doses of cytotoxic drugs may be appropriate in this setting. As
chemotherapy is frequently associated with unpleasant side-effects, social
factors and the psychological status of the patient are important
considerations in the overall treatment plan. Assessment
of the aims of treatment One
of the most important decisions in the management of a patient with cancer
is to identify the ultimate aim of the treatment. When the aim is cure,
the approach is completely different to the situation where palliation or
short-term extension of survival is possible. When attempting cure, more
intensive chemotherapy is used and significantly more toxicity is
acceptable than when palliative treatment is being given. Assessment
of response Continued
evaluation of the benefits of cytotoxic chemotherapy is essential to
ensure that patients do not suffer unnecessary toxicity when no clinical
benefit is being achieved. There are a number of criteria by which
response is assessed. It should be stressed that patients with poorly
responsive tumours may still benefit from chemotherapy to relieve specific
symptoms, even in the absence of any effect on overall survival. Assessment
of toxicity Cytotoxic
drug administration is frequently associated with side-effects. These can
be classified into non-specific toxicities, which are frequently observed
with many different classes of cytotoxic drugs, and organ-specific
toxicities, which are frequently associated with individual drugs (Table 4) 679. Non-specific side-effects of chemotherapy
include myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, tiredness, and
loss of concentration. Marked differences in their severity are observed
between and within different classes of cytotoxic drugs. CLASSIFICATION
OF CYTOTOXIC DRUGS Approximately
50 cytotoxic drugs are currently licensed for clinical use. These drugs
vary in their mode of action and indications for use. They can be grouped
according to their predominant mode of action
(Table 5) 680. Alkylating
agents Many
alkylating agents are commonly used in clinical practice. The majority of
these drugs are bifunctional, having two distinct alkyl groups that can
link covalently to DNA or protein. They have a predilection for alkylation
on the N7 position of guanine in DNA: this can result in abnormal base
pairing of the guanine with thymidine or the formation of inter- or
intrastrand cross-links between two guanine bases, inhibiting DNA
replication. Alkylating agents have single agent activity against a range
of human cancers. Common major toxic effects of alkylating agents include
myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alkylating agents can also
cause infertility and have been implicated in the development of second
neoplasms. It is therefore appropriate, if at all possible, to limit the
use of alkylating agents in the treatment of curable malignancies. The
second neoplasms are predominantly drug-resistant leukaemias that occur 5
to 7 years following drug exposure. There is also an increased risk of
solid tumours developing, with a peak incidence at 6 to 8 years, although
the overall incidence continues to increase with time following treatment.
Cisplatin, which also alkylates and cross-links DNA, is significantly less
likely to cause infertility, and as yet has not been implicated in the
development of second malignancies. Cyclophosphamide Cyclophosphamide
and ifosfamide are active against lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian
cancer, sarcomas, and lymphomas. Dose-limiting toxicities of
cyclophosphamide are myelosuppression and nausea and vomiting. Chlorambucil Chlorambucil
is active in lymphomas and ovarian cancer. It is normally well tolerated,
with minimal nausea and vomiting. The main problem associated with this
drug is delayed myelosuppression associated with severe stem cell damage. Melphalan Melphalan
has many similar properties to chlorambucil. It causes delayed
myelosuppression and minimal gastrointestinal toxicity or alopecia. It is
used to treat myeloma, normally in combination with corticosteroids, and
has also been used in high doses, combined with autologous bone marrow
transplantation, to treat a range of solid tumours. Resistance to
melphalan is occasionally associated with resistance to cisplatin; this is
thought to be related to a common membrane transport mechanism. Nitrosoureas Nitrosoureas
have multiple mechanisms of action, one of which is the alkylation of DNA.
They are used to treat brain tumours. Their use has, however, been
inhibited because of their association with severe gastrointestinal
toxicity and prolonged myelosuppression. Dacarbazine Dacarbazine
is a methylating agent. It is the most active agent in malignant melanoma
with responses of 20 to 25 per cent. It is also used in the treatment of
soft tissue sarcoma and lymphomas. Resistance to this compound is
associated with increased levels of the enzyme O&sub6;-methylguanine
alkyltransferase. It can cause rapid acute and severe gastrointestinal
toxicity. Antimetabolites Methotrexate Methotrexate
is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, and also partially inhibits
thymidylate synthetase. It is active against breast tumours, sarcomas, and
lymphomas. Prolonged administration of high doses of methotrexate can lead
to profound toxicity in the form of myelosuppression, conjunctivitis, and
stomatitis. However, in the doses normally used methotrexate causes few
side-effects. The toxicity associated with methotrexate can be alleviated
by administration of reduced folates (leucovorin). Increased methotrexate
toxicity is seen in patients with hypoalbuminaemia, renal failure, or with
large third spaces such as ascites or pleural effusions. 5-Fluorouracil 5-Fluorouracil
is a well tolerated drug active against gastrointestinal tract cancer and
breast cancer. It is activated to 5′FdUMP
(5′-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine-5′-monophosphate
which binds to and inhibits the activity of thymidylate synthase.
Side-effects include nausea and vomiting, myelosuppression, and
occasionally stomatitis. The latter is dose dependent and increased when
5-fluorouracil is combined with folinic acid (leucovorin). Cytosine
arabinoside Cytosine
arabinoside is an inhibitor of DNA polymerase-&agr; and -&dgr;.
The drug is used predominantly in the treatment of leukaemia and has very
little activity against solid tumour malignancies. Its predominant
side-effects include myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Antitumour
antibiotics Anthracyclines Anthracyclines
are active against lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphomas, bladder cancer,
sarcomas, and gastric cancers. Doxorubicin is the most widely used
anthracycline, but although it is very active, it has significant
toxicity. Epirubicin appears to have a better toxicity profile,
particularly in causing less cardiotoxicity. Toxicities associated with
anthracycline therapy include myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and
cardiac toxicity. Acute cardiac arrhythmias are related to peak plasma
levels, and chronic administration of anthracyclines can lead to a
dose-dependent cardiomyopathy. Free radical scavengers may be able to
protect the heart, and trials are underway to assess this. The
mechanisms of action of anthracyclines are complex. They intercalate DNA,
inhibit topoisomerase 2 activity, and cause free radical damage, and there
is increasing evidence that they have a direct effect on the tumour cell
membrane. The relative role of these different mechanisms of action has
not been defined. Anthracyclines can cause severe local tissue damage if
extravasation occurs. Mitoxantrone Mitoxantrone
is an anthracenedione active against lymphomas and breast cancer. It is
used predominantly in elderly breast cancer patients in view of its
relative lack of toxicity compared to doxorubicin. Its main dose-limiting
toxicity is myelosuppression. Mitomycin
C Mitomycin
C has activity against breast cancer, gastric cancer, and cervical cancer.
It is activated in hypoxic conditions via cytochrome p-450 reductase. Dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression,
although renal toxicity and pulmonary fibrosis can occur, and local
extravasation can cause ulceration. Epipodophyllotoxins There
are two epipodophyllotoxins in clinical use, etoposide (VP16) and
teniposide (VM26). The predominant mode of action is inhibition of
topoisomerase 2, but they also produce free radicals. Etoposide is active
against germ cell malignancies, lymphomas, and lung cancer. The
predominant dose-limiting toxicity of this class of compounds is
myelosuppression, but nausea and vomiting and alopecia are also common. Platinum
compounds Cisplatin
is highly active against many tumours, including germ cell tumours,
ovarian carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, and lung cancer. Although very
active, cisplatin can cause significant toxicity: the risk of
dose-limiting nephrotoxicity can be reduced by adequate hydration. Nausea
and vomiting is a major side-effect, although this has been alleviated to
a degree with the introduction of new antiemetics. Other toxicities
include hypomagnesaemia and peripheral neuropathy. Carboplatin is very
active against germ cell malignancies, and also solid tumours such as
ovarian carcinoma. Renal toxicity and ototoxicity are not a problem, but
renal impairment can lead to increased myelosuppression, which is the
dose-limiting toxicity. Problems associated with myelosuppression make the
drug less suited to combination chemotherapy than cisplatin, and it is
significantly more expensive. Vinca
alkaloids The
vinca alkaloids are mitotic spindle poisons. Vincristine is active against
Hodgkin's disease and breast cancer, the predominant dose-limiting
toxicity being a peripheral, predominantly sensory, neuropathy, although
an autonomic neuropathy can occur. Vinblastine is active against lymphomas
and testicular tumours. Myelosuppression is the dose-limiting toxicity,
but neuropathy is not a problem. ADMINISTRATION
OF CYTOTOXIC DRUGS Most
cytotoxic drugs are administered intravenously as a bolus, or as short
intravenous infusions. This overcomes the problems of unpredictable
patient compliance and drug-induced nausea and vomiting associated with
oral formulations. In
the majority of instances, in particular when the overall aim is cure,
cytotoxic drugs are administered in combination. Each drug should ideally
show a different mode of action, have proven activity as a single agent,
and a different toxicity pattern from the other agents. Cytotoxic drugs
are normally administered in cycles given every 3 to 4 weeks, to allow
bone marrow recovery. The
apparent lack of efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy against the majority
of common solid tumours has resulted in the exploration of different
schedules of drug administration. One approach has been to use more
frequent administration of compounds to which the tumours do not exhibit
cross-resistance. The use of drugs that cause minimal myelosuppression
allows the administration of large doses of cytotoxic drugs on a more
frequent basis, hopefully inhibiting potential regrowth of tumour between
cycles of chemotherapy. Scheduling may be particularly important for some
cytotoxic drugs. Etoposide efficacy has been shown to be strongly
dependent on scheduling: divided dose schedules are significantly superior
to bolus doses and likewise continuous infusions of certain drugs such as
5FU may result in enhanced antitumour activity. TREATMENT
OF SPECIFIC TUMOUR TYPES Lung
cancer (see also Section 35.3
275) Lung
cancer is the most common cancer in the Western world, accounting for
approximately one-third of all male cancer deaths. Many patients die
within 1 year of diagnosis with the majority of lung cancers not
resectable. Lung
cancer can be divided into a number of histological subtypes
(Table 6) 681. There has been recent increase in the incidence of
adenocarcinoma, and presentation of a mixed cell type is not infrequent.
Many histological diagnoses are made on limited biopsy material obtained
during flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy. It is likely, therefore, that the
number of mixed tumours is underestimated. Clinical
features Cough,
breathlessness, and haemoptysis are the most common presenting symptoms in
patients with lung cancer. Other common symptoms include tiredness,
malaise, anorexia, weight loss, and chest pains which can occur in up to
50 per cent of patients. Symptoms suggestive of extensive mediastinal
infiltration of the tumour or of distal metastatic spread are relatively
rare at presentation, except in those with small cell carcinoma, in whom
early dissemination of disease is common. Management
varies for the different histological subtypes. It is, therefore,
important to make a firm histological diagnosis and assessment of disease
spread at presentation. Patients should be discussed jointly between chest
physicians, thoracic surgeons, and oncologists. Confirmation of malignancy
can occasionally be made on sputum cytology, but fibreoptic bronchoscopy
is frequently required to obtain tissue. Occasionally transbronchial
biopsy, percutaneous lung biopsy, mediastinoscopy, or open lung biopsy is
necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Common
sites of metastatic disease include liver, bone, and brain, although
imaging of these areas is not indicated in the absence of any other
clinical indication. All patients should undergo routine haematological
and biochemical tests. A normochromic anaemia is common, although diffuse
bone marrow infiltration is occasionally indicated by a
leucoerythroblastic blood picture. Abnormal biochemical indices are
particularly common in small cell carcinoma with this tumour known to
produce multiple hormones. Hyponatraemia can indicate ectopic antidiuretic
hormone secretion or hypoadrenalism from adrenal metastasis. Abnormalities
of liver function are important: they may indicate hepatic metastases,
which may significantly affect the body's handling of cytotoxic drugs. Treatment Non-small
cell lung cancer The
treatment of choice for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and
sufficient respiratory reserve is surgery. Unfortunately only
approximately 30 per cent of patients have tumours that are resectable at
diagnosis. Among those whose tumour is totally resected, 5-year survival
is 30 per cent. Five-year survival of patients with squamous carcinoma is
25 per cent, compared with 13 per cent in those with other histological
subtypes. Significantly higher survival rates are seen in patients who do
not have mediastinal lymph node involvement at operation. Radiotherapy Radical
radiotherapy can be considered in patients who are unwilling to undergo
surgical resection or in whom resection is impossible because of the site
of the tumour. One-year survival rates following radical radiotherapy
range from 30 to 60 per cent; less than 10 per cent of patients survive 5
years. An interesting recent approach has been the use of
hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy (CHART). Response rates
using this radiotherapy regimen are higher, although it is too early to
comment on long-term survival rates. A potential problem associated with
this approach is the increased possibility of spinal cord damage and this
is being closely monitored. Radiotherapy
is frequently used to relieve superior vena caval obstruction, stridor,
and haemoptysis: symptomatic benefit is obtained in about 75 per cent of
patients. Bone pain is frequently well controlled, and irradiation is
useful for palliation of cerebral metastases or spinal cord compression,
although neurosurgical decompression may be necessary for the latter. Chemotherapy Historically,
non-small cell lung cancer has been considered resistant to chemotherapy.
However, with the advent of platinum combinations, initially vindesine and
cis-platinum, response rates of 30 to 40 per cent have been achieved. This
has not been associated with improved long-term survival, however. Three
of the drugs most active as single agents are cis-platinum, ifosfamide,
and mitomycin C (Table 7)
682. Their use in combination, as the MIC regimen, has produced response
rates of 56 per cent and 47 per cent in two separate studies, with 10 to
20 per cent of patients achieving complete remission. Previous studies
with platinum have been limited by severe toxicity to normal tissue, but
this particular regimen appears to be relatively well tolerated: its
further evaluation is indicated. Median survival in patients receiving
chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is, however, only 6 to 8
months. Further
developments A
major challenge is the identification of patients with limited non-small
cell lung cancer who relapse early and have a poor prognosis. Greater
understanding of the biology of the disease may help identify these
patients, who may be suitable for more aggressive treatment, and may also
define targets for future therapeutic development. For example, non-small
cell lung cancers express an increased number of epidermal growth factor
receptors on the cell surface, although whether this affects prognosis
remains unanswered. The epidermal growth factor receptor itself may prove
to be a therapeutic target for imaging or therapy, with the development of
monoclonal antibodies to this receptor. These monoclonal antibodies may
inhibit growth via inhibition of growth factor binding, or by toxicity due
to conjugation with toxins or cytotoxic drugs. Small
cell lung cancer Small
cell lung cancer is totally different to non-small cell lung cancer. It is
highly metastatic, and the majority of patients have widely disseminated
disease at presentation. The prognosis is poor: untreated patients have a
median survival of 3 to 4 months. Pathophysiology Small
cell lung cancers contain large numbers of neurosecretory granules on
electron microscopy. These cells frequently secrete a range of potential
tumour markers such as antidiuretic hormone, ACTH, and calcitonin,
although secretion of parathyroid hormone is normally associated with
squamous carcinomas. They exhibit high levels of neuroendocrine markers
such as bombesin (gastrin releasing peptide), neurone specific enolase,
the BB isoenzyme of creatinine kinase, and L-dopa decarboxylase. The more
aggressive, so-called ‘variant phenotype’ has lower
levels of L-dopa decarboxylase and bombesin and is more frequently
associated with amplification of the c- myc oncogene. A
recessive deletion of a fragment of the short arm of chromosome 3
(3p14–23) has been identified in small cell carcinomas. This
deletion is present in all small cell lung cancers, and is likely to
involve loss of more than 1 tumour suppressor gene although the genes
affected have not been identified. Chemotherapy In
view of its early dissemination, the mainstay of treatment is
chemotherapy. A large number of cytotoxic drugs have caused tumour
regression in patients with small cell lung cancer
(Table 8) 683, but when used as single agents they have minimal
effect on survival. Combination chemotherapy is significantly superior to
single agent chemotherapy in terms of response rate, response duration,
and overall survival. Response rates approaching 90 per cent can now be
achieved, with 2-year survival rates ranging from 10 to 20 per cent.
However, less than 5 per cent of patients are cured or long-term
survivors, and the median survival is approximately 12 to 14 months. Radiotherapy The
role of radiotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer has not
been clarified. Patients with limited disease who achieve a complete
response following chemotherapy may derive additional benefit from
thoracic radiotherapy, although increased morbidity in the form of
oesophagitis and pneumonitis may result. In 1985, Arriagada reported a 37
per cent 2-year relapse-free survival rate in patients treated with
chemotherapy and intercollated radiotherapy. However the toxicity of this
regimen was severe, and it is currently being re-evaluated. Cerebral
metastases are found in about 20 per cent of patients with small cell lung
cancer. Prophylactic cranial irradiation can reduce the incidence of this
to less than 10 per cent, although it may be associated with significant
toxicity to the central nervous system. The role of prophylactic cranial
irradiation is currently being addressed in a Medical Research Council
trial in the United Kingdom, and at this time, this treatment should be
limited to patients with the best prognosis. Surgery The
role of surgery in small cell carcinoma is ill defined. In general,
surgery is not an appropriate approach. However, a number of patients with
peripheral nodules, subsequently found to be small cell carcinomas, have
exhibited survival similar to that of patients with non-small cell lung
cancer. Patients with resectable small cell carcinoma of the lung may
benefit from primary surgery followed by adjuvant combination
chemotherapy. Breast
cancer (see also Section 12.2
89) Carcinoma
of the breast is the most common malignant cause of death in females in
the United Kingdom. Aetiology There
is an increased incidence of breast cancer in patients who have a
first-degree relative with breast cancer. Molecular genetic studies have
revealed a locus on chromosome 17, associated with familial breast cancer,
and studies are well advanced towards the isolation and sequencing of the
gene involved (BrCa1). Patients with breast cancer, particularly of
lobular histology, have an increased incidence of malignancy in the
contralateral breast. The age at which a woman has her child is important:
there is a decreased incidence of breast cancer in women whose first child
is born before 18 years of age. Women with early menarche or a late
menopause are at higher risk of breast cancer. Hormone
dependency Beatson
first described regression of breast carcinomas following oophorectomy in
1896. Subsequent studies have confirmed the oestrogen dependency of this
tumour. Oestrogen
is the most important factor in the development and growth control of
breast cancer. This hormone stimulates cellular proliferation,
transcription of several mRNAs, and the production of a number of growth
factors which may act in an autocrine or paracrine fashion to stimulate
breast cancer proliferation. Over 60 per cent of breast cancers express
oestrogen receptors; this number increases with age. Breast cancer tissue
also expresses receptors for progesterone, prolactin, androgen, and
glucocorticoid. Increased
expression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) is observed in
one-third of breast carcinomas, and is associated with high-grade and
hormone-independent cancer. Other proteins with homology to EGFR have been
identified. C- erb B2 (HER–2/neu) encodes a putative growth
factor receptor whose expression is amplified in 17 per cent of breast
cancers. A structurally similar receptor C- erb B3 has also recently been
described. Its ligand is amphiregulin, which has also been shown to bind
to the epidermal growth factor receptor, although the predominant ligands
for the latter are epidermal growth factor itself and transforming growth
factor-&agr;. Although
axillary node disease is the most important prognostic indicator in breast
cancer, the expression of a number of growth factors and their receptors
have been associated with poor prognosis independent of oestrogen receptor
status. Patients with stage II breast carcinoma which expresses epidermal
growth factor receptors have poorer relapse-free and overall survival
rates than those with cancers that do not express the receptor. A similar
correlation is observed with expression of pro-cathepsin D. In stage 1
disease the role of expression of these receptors on prognosis remains
unclear: in these patients the high S-phase fraction appears to be the
most reliable indicator of poor prognosis although recent studies suggest
that the degree of angiogenesis in the primary tumour may be very
important. Treatment In
recent years there has been a switch to more conservative surgical
treatment of the primary breast tumour, where possible. Axillary nodes
should always be biopsied in view of the prognostic implications of stage
II disease, to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant
treatment Adjuvant
systemic treatment should be considered in all patients with stage II
breast cancer. Improvement in relapse-free and overall survival rates has
been seen following chemotherapy in premenopausal patients. In
postmenopausal patients, improvements in relapse-free and overall survival
rates can be achieved with the anti-oestrogen tamoxifen. The role of
adjuvant chemotherapy has been evaluated widely. Initial studies were
based on 12 months adjuvant chemotherapy, but, recent study has shown that
6 months of treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and
5-fluorouracil is as effective. A recent overview of adjuvant trials in
breast cancer reviewed over 20 000 patients treated with adjuvant
chemotherapy or endocrine therapy entered in controlled trials. This
confirmed that combination chemotherapy significantly reduced early
mortality in premenopausal patients and that adjuvant hormone therapy
significantly reduced mortality in postmenopausal patients. Adjuvant
treatment of patients with node negative disease is controversial. At
present, there is no general indication for treatment of this group as a
whole, although a small number of these patients suffer early relapse and
die of metastatic disease. A number of studies are currently addressing
the problem of identification of this subset of patients, and randomizing
them between adjuvant chemotherapy or to a control group. Other studies
are evaluating whether more aggressive chemotherapy schedules are better
in high-risk patients, and early results appear to confirm this. A recent
study looked at the effects of chemotherapy on relapse-free and overall
survival in node-negative patients with oestrogen receptor-negative
tumours or primary tumours of at least 3 cm in diameter. Five-year
disease-free interval in treated patients was 83 per cent to 61 per cent
in the control group. It is too early to assess whether overall survival
is affected by chemotherapy in this study. Tamoxifen has been shown to be
of benefit, in terms of overall survival, in both node-negative and
node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Treatment
of advanced disease Although
high response rates can be achieved with systemic therapy in advanced
disease, it is not curative. It is very effective for symptomatic control,
can produce remission in a subgroup of patients, and may extend survival
in some patients, although this remains controversial. Current studies are
addressing whether high dose chemotherapy, including bone marrow
transplantation, is more effective for long-term control, and results are
eagerly awaited. Endocrine
therapy The
likelihood of response to endocrine therapy is indicated by the presence
of steroid hormone receptors. Patients who express high levels of
oestrogen receptor have response rates of 50 per cent, whereas in those
who have few or no oestrogen receptors the likelihood of response is 5 per
cent. Alteration
of the endocrine profile in patients, either with hormones or
antihormones, or by ablation of endocrine glands, is associated with an
overall response rate of 25 to 35 per cent; symptomatic improvement is
seen in a further 20 per cent of patients. The median duration of response
to hormone therapy is 18 months. Response can be delayed, and patients
with life-threatening metastases, such as lymphangitis or liver
metastases, should be considered for systemic chemotherapy in the first
instance. Tamoxifen
exhibits anti-oestrogen properties. It inhibits breast cancer growth by
binding to the oestrogen receptor, preventing binding of oestradiol, and
subsequently leading to the secretion of the growth inhibiting protein,
transforming growth factor -&ggr;. Response rates are virtually
identical to those seen following oophorectomy, and toxicity is minimal,
particularly in postmenopausal patients. Alternative
endocrine therapies are now available and are effective in advanced
disease. Aromatase is an important enzyme involved in the peripheral
production of oestrogen from androgens. Aminoglutethimide is a potent
inhibitor of this enzyme: doses of 125 mg twice a day produce a response
rate of 19 per cent. Although steroid supplementation is not necessary at
this dosage, the addition of hydrocortisone further reduces oestradiol
levels and increased the response rate to 27 per cent. Luteinizing
hormone releasing hormone agonists are also effective, particularly in
premenopausal patients. Depot injections of compounds such as zoladex are
given every 4 weeks. This results in decreased oestradiol levels, although
there is an initial stimulation of oestradiol production, occasionally
associated with a tumour flare response. Responses have also been
documented in postmenopausal patients, where a direct antitumour effect is
postulated. Chemotherapy Many
cytotoxic drugs are effective in breast cancer
(Table 9) 684. The most effective agents so far tested have been
the anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin and epirubicin. Response rates
range from 20 to 50 per cent with single agent chemotherapy. Higher
response rates have been achieved with anthracyclines where bone marrow
toxicity was controlled by administration of bone marrow growth factors.
Combination chemotherapy yields response rates of up to 70 per cent but
survival rates are not significantly better than those achieved with
effective single agent anthracycline therapy. Complete response rates
range from 10 to 20 per cent and responses last for 8 to 12 months. Median
survival of patients following chemotherapy ranges from 12 to 24 months, In
view of its limited effect on survival, it would appear appropriate to
limit the duration of chemotherapy. A recent study compared mitoxantrone
given for four courses only with prolonged administration of the same drug
and no significant difference was observed. Germ
cell malignancy (see also Section
33.10 376) Germ
cell malignancy is one area where major therapeutic advances have been
achieved in the systemic management of a solid tumour in the last 10 to 15
years. There are many reasons for this, including the introduction of
platinum compounds. In addition, identification of residual disease has
been improved both by CT scanning and by measurement of serological
markers such as &agr;-fetoprotein and &bgr;-human chorionic
gonadotrophin. Germ
cell tumours are the most common malignancy in young men, and the
incidence is increasing. Diagnosis of testicular teratoma at inguinal
orchidectomy should be followed by detailed screening, including CT scans
of the abdomen and thorax and repeated estimations of tumour markers to
identify residual or recurrent disease. Levels of either
&agr;-fetoprotein or &bgr;-human chorionic gonadotrophin, or both,
are elevated in 80 to 90 per cent of patients with teratoma. These markers
are generally negative in seminoma. Poor
prognostic features include bulky disease, para-aortic or mediastinal
lymphadenopathy greater than 10 cm in diameter, high levels of tumour
markers (&agr;-fetoprotein > 500 i.u./l; &bgr;-human
chorionic gonadotrophin 1000 i.u./l). Metastatic spread to liver, bone, or
brain are bad prognostic features, and primary extragonadal germ cell
tumours have a poor prognosis. Management Seminoma There
are a number of unresolved questions in the management of patients with
seminoma. In patients with stage I disease, orchidectomy and locoregional
radiotherapy produces a cure rate approaching 100 per cent. However, 80
per cent of those patients would be cured by surgery alone. It would seem
logical, therefore, to undertake close surveillance to detect the 20 per
cent of patients who are going to relapse at an early stage, avoiding
administration of radiotherapy in 80 per cent of patients. However, such
monitoring is costly, and there is no reliable screening test for
seminoma, making this policy difficult to follow in routine clinical
practice. Stage 2A disease is treated with radiotherapy. The
management of stage 2B disease is controversial. Relapse rates following
radiotherapy approach 20 per cent, and chemotherapy would appear to be a
logical option, although many groups still use radiotherapy. Stage 2C and
above should be treated with chemotherapy using platinum either alone or
in combination chemotherapy. The role of additional radiotherapy in these
patients is not resolved. Teratoma The
recommended approach to stage I disease is observation, with measurement
of serum markers every month and CT scans every 3 months over the first
year. Combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for disease of
stages 2A to 4. Platinum-based combinations such as bleomycin, etoposide,
and cisplatinum produce cure rates of 80 to 90 per cent in patients with
small tumours; new approaches are aimed at reducing treatment/related
toxicity. The EORTC is currently evaluating standard bleomycin, etoposide,
and cisplatinum chemotherapy compared with etoposide and cisplatinum
alone. Early reports show no significant difference between the two
treatment groups, although slightly more relapses were observed in
patients receiving only two drugs. The
response of patients with large tumours is significantly inferior: less
than 60 per cent achieve a complete remission. Newlands et al. reported on
the administration of cisplatinum, vincristine, methotrexate, and
bleomycin, alternating with actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide
every 10 to 14 days. Patients received two cycles of chemotherapy
following the achievement of complete remission. Complete remission was
achieved in more than 80 per cent of patients with bulky abdominal or
mediastinal disease using this regimen. Role
of surgery in germ cell malignancy Debulking
following chemotherapy is now standard treatment for residual disease. In
one study, surgically removed tissue was found to contain differentiated
teratoma (44 per cent), fibrotic/necrotic material (34 per cent), and
residual malignancy (23 per cent). The last finding is an indication for
continuation of chemotherapy. Such surgery, together with additional
chemotherapy where indicated, has significantly increased the survival of
patients with bulky germ cell tumours. Colorectal
cancer (see also Section 18.3
133) Colorectal
cancer is the second most common cancer in the United Kingdom, after lung
cancer in males. Pathogenesis The
last few years has seen a tremendous increase in our understanding of the
progression of malignancy in bowel tumours. Primarily, this stemmed from
molecular genetics and our understanding of the mechanisms involved in
allelic loss, and its relationship to the development of human malignancy.
This was most clearly demonstrated in retinoblastoma. Cytogenetic and
linkage studies mapped the retinoblastoma locus to 13q14. Retinoblastoma
is believed to occur when an individual who has inherited one mutant
retinoblastoma gene loses the normal allele by one of a number of
mechanisms, including mitotic non-junction or recombination. Abnormalities
at this locus are also found in other human cancers, such as small cell
lung cancer. Similar
studies into the mechanism of malignant progression have been undertaken
in patients with polyposis coli. Although only a small proportion of
colorectal cancers are found in patients with polyposis, between 10 and 20
per cent of all colorectal carcinomas probably have an underlying genetic
predisposition. The gene responsible for familial adenomatous polyposis
has been mapped to chromosome 5q: this region is deleted in approximately
30 per cent of sporadic adenomas. Frequent genetic changes involving
tumour suppressor genes have been identified in colorectal tumours: 17p
and 18q deletions are observed in 75 per cent of colorectal carcinomas. It
is thought that the deletion at 17p causes loss of a p53 allele, leaving a
single mutated p53 allele. An 18q deletion has also frequently been
detected in colorectal carcinomas. There is a candidate tumour suppressor
gene in this area termed the DCC gene. The true function of the protein
product of this gene has not been identified. It
has been suggested that there are a number of additional abnormalities in
colorectal cancer, and these appear to develop sequentially.
Hypomethylation is present early, as are mutations in the K- ras oncogene,
together with deletion of alleles on chromosome 5q. Deletions involving
18q and 17p appear to be late events. Further evaluation of this process
may help in our understanding of the development of other solid tumours
and also may identify valuable targets for drug design. Treatment Surgery
remains the mainstay of treatment for primary, and occasionally metastatic
colorectal carcinoma. In addition, palliative surgery may occasionally be
indicated to improve the quality of life in patients with unresectable
colorectal carcinoma. Systemic
chemotherapy of colorectal carcinoma has been extremely disappointing.
Response rates to many cytotoxic drugs are less than 20 per cent, complete
remission is almost never seen. 5-Fluorouracil has been the drug of
choice, with response rates approaching 20 per cent; however, the median
duration of this response is relatively short and is normally less than 6
months. Recently
there has been great interest in the modulation of 5-fluorouracil
cytotoxicity using folinic acid. Response rates range from 30 to 40 per
cent obtained—a significant improvement over those obtained with
5-fluorouracil alone. Future
developments New
drugs that are more active than the commonly used agents are required. The
development of monoclonal antibodies to specific antigens on the surface
of colorectal carcinomas may prove to be of value. In the longer term,
development of new compounds based on our understanding of the
pathogenesis of the tumour may be more successful, such as targeting to
the abnormal p53 protein product produced in this tumour type. RESISTANCE
TO CYTOTOXIC DRUGS Although
progress has been made in the treatment of certain malignant conditions,
cure remains elusive for the majority of disseminated malignancies
affecting adults. Resistance to the currently used cytotoxic drugs is
common; this may occur for many reasons
(Table 10) 685. At the cellular biochemical level resistance
mechanisms are multiple and tend to vary with the class of compound to
which resistance has developed. Antimetabolite
resistance Mechanisms
of resistance to antimetabolites vary with different compounds.
Methotrexate resistance has been widely studied and a number of potential
mechanisms of resistance have been proposed
(Table 11) 686. Multiple
drug resistance Cells
made resistant to single cytotoxic drugs such as doxorubicin or
vinblastine in vitro frequently exhibit cross-resistance to a range of
other structurally unrelated cytotoxic drugs derived from natural
products. This form of resistance is associated with an alteration in drug
transport, leading to decreased intracellular cytotoxic drug levels.
Increased drug efflux is energy dependent and is associated with the
presence of a 170 kDa membrane glycoprotein, p-glycoprotein. The gene
encoding p-glycoprotein has since been cloned, and called mdr1. Multiple
drug resistance genes have been conserved through many species. In man
there are two genes, mdr1 (associated with the multiple drug resistance
phenotype), and mdr2 for which no function has as yet been identified.
Transfection of the mdr1 gene into recipient cells leads to expression of
the resistance phenotype, indicating that this resistance is associated
with over-expression of a single gene. In
normal tissues, expression of mdr1 is increased in the liver, colon,
kidney, and adrenal gland, while low levels are found in the bone marrow
and in lung. p-Glycoprotein is found on the luminal surface of a number of
organs such as the bile canaliculi in the liver, the luminal surface of
the proximal renal tubule, and on the luminal surface of the colon.
Although the precise function of this glycoprotein in normal cells is not
well defined, this distribution suggests that it has a major role in drug
transport and drug excretion. High
levels of mdr1 mRNA have been found in tumours derived from tissues that
normally expresses high levels of mdr1 mRNA. These tumours are highly
resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy at presentation suggesting a potential
role for p-glycoprotein in intrinsic drug resistance. Cancers such as
acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and myeloma, in contrast, have low levels of
mdr1 RNA at presentation and are relatively sensitive to cytotoxic drugs.
On relapse, mdr1 levels are increased, and drug resistance is frequently
observed, indicating a possible role for this gene in acquired drug
resistance. Detoxification
mechanisms Cytotoxic
drugs and their metabolic products are frequently highly reactive, and
there are many natural mechanisms within the cell designed to detoxify
reactive molecules. Glutathione, a tripeptide (&ggr;-glutamyl
cysteinyl glycine) which is present in millimolar concentrations in all
cells of the body, protects the cell against reactive molecules using the
free sulphhydryl group on the cysteine. This can detoxify a range of
metabolites via conjugation reactions: the reaction rate of these
reactions is dramatically increased if they are catalysed by one of the
glutathione transferase isoenzymes. Glutathione is also an important
detoxification mechanism for the handling of free radicals: Glutathione
forms conjugates with may cytotoxic drugs, and elevated glutathione levels
have been associated with resistance to cytotoxic drugs both in vitro and
in vivo. Exposure of cells in vitro to buthionine sulphoximine causes a
progressive depletion in cellular glutathione levels, resulting in
enhanced sensitivity to a range of cytotoxic drugs. However, one of the
problems of using this approach as a therapeutic strategy has been its
relative lack of selectivity for tumour tissue. Glutathione
levels are generally higher in tumour cells than in normal tissue. This
fact could prove to be valuable clinically, using glutathione to activate
cytotoxic drugs, with neocarzinostatin, which is inactive in its parental
form but is reduced by glutathione to the active metabolite. Toxicity to
normal tissue precludes the clinical use of neocarzinostatin, but better
tolerated analogues may be developed. The
glutathione transferases comprise a multigene family of isoenzymes with a
wide range of substrate specificity. They are conserved through many
species and form an important cellular protective mechanism against a wide
range of xenobiotics and carcinogens. The nomenclature of these enzymes is
complex. However, the enzymes can be loosely grouped into three main
cytosolic classes of glutathione transferases, which are divided according
to their separation by isoelectric focusing
(Fig. 4) 2779. Acidic
transferases are expressed at higher levels than the other classes of
glutathione transferases in all solid tumours studied. It has been
suggested that the acidic transferases may serve as a serological tumour
marker, but this remains unsubstantiated. Increased expression of the
acidic transferase has been described in drug-resistant cell lines, such
as MCF7 breast cancer cells made resistant to doxorubicin. However,
resistance to alkylating agents has also been associated with elevated
expression of other glutathione transferases including basic, neutral, and
microsomal glutathione transferases. A
number of glutathione transferase genes have now been cloned and expressed
in cellular models. Two studies found that transfection of an acidic
transferase was not associated with doxorubicin resistance, whereas two
other studies observed increase resistance to alkylating agents and
doxorubicin following transfection of acidic and basic glutathione
transferases. The precise role of glutathione transferases in clinical
drug resistance therefore remains unclear. Glutathione transferases may
provide a target for chemotherapy in the future if it becomes possible to
identify specific differences in isoenzyme profile between tumour and
normal tissues. DNA
topoisomerases The
topoisomerases are nuclear enzymes that are intimately involved in DNA
replication, transcription, and recombination. The type 2 topoisomerases,
which have been most widely studied, exist in &agr; and &bgr;
forms, which appear to have different cellular functions. These
energy-dependent enzymes are essential for cell growth and division. Since
they bind covalently to DNA they represent a target for a number of
cytotoxic drugs, including anthracyclines such as doxorubicin, and
epipodophyllotoxins such as etoposide. These cytotoxic drugs act by
freezing the normal catalytic activity of the enzyme, producing the
so-called ‘cleavable complex’ which prevents strand
passage and religation of previously nicked DNA. Increased topoisomerase 2
activity is associated with sensitivity to inhibitors of the enzyme, with
high levels of enzyme activity identified in sensitive tumour types such
as testicular teratoma. Resistance
to topoisomerase 2 inhibitors develops rapidly. The majority of
topoisomerase inhibitors used in clinical practice are transported by
p-glycoprotein and these drugs form part of the
‘so-called’ multiple drug resistance phenotype.
Development of inhibitors that are not transported by this mechanism could
prove to be a major therapeutic advance. However, there are other
mechanisms by which resistance to topoisomerase 2 inhibitors may develop.
Decreased enzyme activity can be caused by modification of gene expression
through hypomethylation of DNA, mutations of the gene decreased mRNA
expression, or reduced specific activity of the enzyme itself.
Alternatively, it is also potential feasible to enhance cellular
chemosensitivity by up-regulating topoisomerase 2 expression. This has
been achieved using growth factors such as oestrogen in breast cancer
cells. DNA
topoisomerase 1 is a monomeric protein that may also prove to be an
important target. Camptothecin, which was toxic in early clinical trials,
inhibits topoisomerase 1 activity by freezing the cleavable complex, in a
similar manner to the action of topoisomerase 2 inhibitors. Recently an
analogue of camptothecin has been shown to produce remissions in human
colon cancer xenografts, and the development of this and other
topoisomerase 1 inhibitors may produce valuable anticancer drugs. DNA
REPAIR Abnormalities
in DNA repair are associated with hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents
and with a number of cancer-prone syndromes, including ataxia
telangectasia, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne's syndrome, and Fanconi's
anaemia. It is less clear whether increased levels of DNA repair are
important in resistance to cytotoxic drugs, although over-expression of
O&sub6;-methylguanine alkyltransferase, has been associated with
resistance to methylating agents such as dacarbazine. At
present there is a great deal of interest in the role of DNA repair in
resistance to cisplatin. Resistance to cisplatin is multifactorial:
reduced cellular accumulation of the drug is important in some models, and
enhanced cellular detoxification by glutathione or metallothioneins
important in others. However, some models associate resistance to
cisplatin with enhanced DNA repair. In one model, resistance is associated
with enhanced intrastrand cross-link repair. This may be important
clinically: the reduced capacity of testicular teratoma to repair platinum
adducts in vitro compared with bladder carcinoma cells may, in part,
account for their exquisite sensitivity to cisplatin. In
bacteria, DNA repair is inducible by a number of mechanisms. An
‘SOS’ response which can be activated by a wide range
of DNA damaging agents results in increased expression of a number of DNA
repair genes. Alternatively, alkylation of DNA can lead to an adaptive
response which results in increased expression of a limited number of
repair enzymes, including O&sub6;-methyl guanine alkyltransferase.
Inducibility of DNA repair has not been demonstrated in mammalian cells,
although this is likely to occur and may be an important factor in
resistance to cytotoxic drugs. The many mechanisms by which tumours may
become resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy at the cellular level are
poorly understood at present. More advanced tumours and increasing numbers
of cell divisions undergone by the tumour, are correlated with a greater
likelihood of resistance developing via a mutation affecting one of these
cellular mechanisms. Greater understanding of the mechanisms of drug
resistance would help us to devise novel treatment strategies to overcome
it. APPROACHES
TO MODIFY DRUG RESISTANCE There
are a number of potential ways to circumvent the clinical problem of
resistance to cytotoxic drugs. (Table
12) 687. Analogue
development A
number of analogues of commonly used cytotoxic drugs are already in
clinical use. These were developed primarily to reduce the toxicity
associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy; for example, carboplatin has a
totally different pattern of toxicity compared to cisplatin. Likewise, the
anthracycline epirubicin causes significantly less gastrointestinal
toxicity and decreased cardiac toxicity compared to doxorubicin. In
addition to circumventing dose limiting toxicities of the parent drugs,
analogues may also exhibit different patterns of antitumour activity by
circumvention of particular mechanisms of drug resistance. For instance
novel anthracyclines are being developed that do not appear to exhibit the
cross-resistance pattern shown by parent anthracyclines such as
doxorubicin. It is hoped that these drugs will enter clinical trials in
the near future. Increased
dose intensity Increased
doses of chemotherapy can be used if the common major dose-limiting
toxicities of cytotoxic administration can be controlled. Antiemetics Improved
control of chemotherapy-induced emesis has been achieved by greater
understanding of the mechanisms involved. Combinations of antiemetics with
different modes of action, administered up to 24 h before the commencement
of cytotoxic chemotherapy has led to much better control of emesis.
Elucidation of the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor in cytotoxic drug
induced emesis has led to the development of a range of relatively
non-toxic specific receptor antagonists which are very effective. Complete
control of nausea and vomiting can be achieved with 5-hydroxytryptamine
receptor antagonists in 50 per cent of patients receiving cisplatin.
Greater control is possible when these antiemetics are used in combination
with steroids. Bone
marrow support Myelosuppression
is the most common dose-limiting toxicity associated with many cytotoxic
drugs. This problem can be reduced by bone marrow or peripheral blood stem
cell transplantation or with haematopoietic growth factor support. Bone
marrow transplantation has been of unquestionable benefit in the treatment
of many leukaemias, but results using this approach in many solid tumour
malignancies have been less successful. In the treatment of small cell
carcinoma of the lung, neither early or late intensification of
chemotherapy has made a significant impact on overall survival. A
number of haematopoietic growth factors have recently been cloned and will
be available for clinical use. This group of glycoproteins include the
colony stimulating factors (granulocyte, granulocyte–macrophage,
macrophage), erythropoietin, and the interleukins. Recent clinical studies
have shown the beneficial effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor
and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in the prevention of
sepsis associated with severe cytotoxic drug-induced neutropenia. Growth
factor support reduces the extent and duration of the white blood cell
count nadir in these studies, reducing the risk of life-threatening
neutropenic sepsis. The introduction of these compounds into clinical
practice represents an exciting new development in cancer chemotherapy. Organ
specific toxicity The
dose intensity of cytotoxic chemotherapy could be increased if
dose-limiting organ specific toxicity could be controlled. For example,
haemorrhagic cystitis associated with ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide
therapy can be controlled by administration of the sulphhydryl-containing
compound mesna. Mesna acts by conjugating acrolein, a highly reactive
metabolite of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide, preventing bladder
toxicity. Modulation
of multiple drug resistance Many
compounds bind to p-glycoprotein, inhibiting its function as an efflux
pump and reversing the resistance phenotype. Verapamil, a calcium channel
blocker, was the first compound shown to bind to p-glycoprotein and
reverse the resistance phenotype. Unfortunately levels of verapamil
required to reverse resistance are not clinically achievable without
severe cardiotoxicity. New, less toxic modulators are required to enable
the achievement of plasma levels equivalent to those shown to be effective
in vitro. Most calcium channel blockers are effective, and other compounds
such as quinidine, chlorpromazine, chloroquine, reserpine, tamoxifen, and
cyclosporin A have been shown partially to reverse drug resistance in
vitro. Clinical trials of these potential modulators of drug resistance
are currently underway. Cyclosporins and tamoxifen show the greatest
promise, as the levels effective in vitro are clinically achievable, with
acceptable toxicity. In the future combinations of multidrug resistance
modifiers or combinations of modifiers affecting multiple mechanisms of
action may be used to increase the therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic
chemotherapy. Modulation
of detoxification Drug
detoxification can be modulated experimentally by compounds such as
buthionine sulphoximine which deplete intracellular glutathione levels.
Such agents are only of value if they are selective against tumour tissue.
A more promising approach may be to develop drugs that require activation
by glutathione. Inhibition
of DNA repair A
number of drugs used in clinical practice are known to inhibit DNA repair.
Hydroxyurea inhibits ribonucleotide reductase at clinically achievable
levels, starving the cell of deoxyribonucleotides and inhibiting DNA
synthesis. Cytosine arabinoside inhibits DNA polymerase &agr; and
&dgr; at clinically achievable levels. These compounds have minimal
activity against human solid tumours. Their use to inhibit DNA repair
following treatment with cisplatin is currently being studied. However,
new and more specific repair inhibitors are required: aphidocolin, one
such agent currently under investigation, enhances cisplatin toxicity in
the experimental setting. NEW
DRUG DEVELOPMENT There
is a great need to develop new compounds with novel mechanisms of action.
One way to achieve this is by the random screening of a large number of
compounds as exemplified by the National Cancer Institute (USA) Drug
Discovery Project which tests a large number of new compounds annually
against panels of human cell lines derived from a wide range of
histological subtypes of cancer. The
second, and possibly more optimistic approach, is to use our increasing
knowledge of the cell biology of human cancer to identify potential
targets for drug development. The identification of differences between
normal and neoplastic cells gives us the opportunity to develop new
classes of anticancer agents with greater selectivity than do the present
drugs. Recent understanding of the importance of autocrine and paracrine
growth factors and growth factor receptors in malignant cell growth
identifies valuable targets for potential growth inhibitors. These
inhibitors could be monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic drugs,
toxins or radionuclides, or, indeed, short peptides. Increasing
understanding of second messenger systems involved in transmitting signals
from the cell membrane to the nucleus opens an exciting new field for the
development of new classes of anticancer agents, and lead compounds are
already undergoing clinical evaluation. SUMMARY Although
improvements have been made in the treatment of solid tumour malignancies
over this time there has been minimal impact overall on the mortality
associated with these diseases. Over the next decade there is the
opportunity for great improvements to occur in the management of solid
tumours, in particular, the identification of high risk groups to be
selected for adjuvant systemic treatment and also in the development of
novel anticancer agents reflecting increasing understanding of the biology
of neoplastic cell growth. FURTHER
READING Arriagada
R, et al. Alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules in small
cell lung cancer limited disease. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1985;
11: 1461–7. Batist
G, Tupule A, Sinha BK, Katki AG, Meyers CE, Cowan KH. Overexpression of a
novel anionic glutathione transferase in multidrug resistant human breast
cancer cells. J Biol Chem 1986; 261: 15544–9. Bonadonna
G, Valagussa P. Systemic therapy in resectable breast cancer. In:
Henderson IC, ed. Haematology/Oncology Clinics of North America.
Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989: 727. Breast
Cancer Trials Committee, Scottish Cancer Trials Office (MRC). Adjuvant
tamoxifen in the management of operable breast cancer: the Scottish trial.
Lancet 1987; ii: 171–5. Bronchud
MH, et al. Phase I/II study of recombinant human granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for
small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 1987; 56: 809–14. Bronchud
MH, Howell A, Crowther D, Hopwood P, Souza L, Dexter TM. The use of
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase the intensity of
treatment with doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast and ovarian
cancer. Br J Cancer 1989; 60: 121–5. Calvert
AH, Carter SK, Egorin MJ, eds. Proceedings: The cell membrance and cell
signals as target in cancer chemotherapy, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989;
24 (Supplement 2). Carmichael
J, Cantwell BMJ, Edwards CM, Rapeport WG, Harris AL. The serotonin type 3
receptor antagonist BRL 43694 and nausea and vomiting induced by
cisplatin. Br Med J 1988; 297: 110–1. Carney
DN, et al. Establishment and identification of small cell lung cancer cell
lines having classic and variant features. Cancer Res 1985; 45:
291–323. Cullen
MH, Joshi R, Chetiyawardana AD, Woodroffe CM. Mitomycin, ifosfamide and
cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: Treatment good enough to
compare. Br J Cancer 1988; 58: 359–61. Cunningham
D, et al. Prevention of emesis in patients receiving cytotoxic drugs by GR
38032F, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Lancet 1987; i:
1461–3. Currie
DC, et al. Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in non-small-cell lung
cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1990; 25: 380–1. DeVita
VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Cancer Principles & Practice of
Oncology, Vol 1 & 2. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company,
1985. Dische
S, Saunders MI. Continuous, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy
(Chart). Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 325. Drake
FH, Hofmann GA, Bartus HF, Mattern MR, Crooke ST, Mirabelli CK.
Biochemical and pharmacological properties of p170 and p180 forms of
topoisomerase II. Biochemistry 1989; 28: 8154–60. Early
Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. The effects of adjuvant
tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer: an
overview of 61 randomised trials among 28,896 women. N Engl J Med 1988;
319: 1681. Eastman
A, Schulte N. Enhanced DNA repair as a mechanism of resistance to
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum. Biochemistry 1988; 27: 4730. Einhorn
LH, Donohue JP. Cis-diamine-dichloroplatinum, vinblastine and bleomycin
combination chemotherapy in disseminated testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med
1977; 87: 293–8. Fisher
B, Fisher ER, Redmond C. Ten year results from the NSABP clinical trial
evaluating the use of L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of
primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 929. Giovanella
BC, et al. DNA Topoisomerase I-targeted chemotherapy of human colon cancer
in xenografts. Science 1989; 246: 1046–8. Hamilton
TC, Masuda H, Young RC. Modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity by inhibition
of DNA repair in a cisplatin resistant human ovarian cancer cell line.
Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1987; 28: 1151. Harris
AL, et al. Comparison of short-term and continuous chemotherapy
(Mitozantrone) for advanced breast cancer. Lancet 1990; 335:
186–90. Hayes
JD, Wolf CR. Role of glutathione transferase in drug resistance.
Glutathione Conjugation—Mechanisms and Biological Significance.
London: Academic Press 1988. Hermanek
P, Sobin LH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 4th edn. UICC,
Springer-Verlag, 1987.Kessel D. Resistance to Antineoplastic Drugs. CRC
Press Inc., 1989. Knudson
AG. Mutation and Cancer: Statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 1971; 68: 820–3. Kramer
RA, Zakher J, Kim G. Role of the glutathione redox cycle in acquired and
de novo multidrug resistance. Science 1988; 241: 694–6. Kraus
MH, Issing W, Miki T, Popescu NC, Aaronson SA. Isolation and
characterization of ERBB3, a third member of the ERBB/epidermal growth
factor receptor family: evidence for overexpression in a subset of human
mammary tumours. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 9193–7. Mansour
EG, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node-negative
breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 485–90. Newlands
ES, Reynolds KW. The role of surgery in metastatic testicular germ cell
tumours (GCT). Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 837–9. Newlands
ES, Begent RH, Rustin GJ, Parker D, Bagshawe KD. Further advances in the
management of malignant teratoma of the testis and other sites. Lancet
1983; i: 948–51. Nicholson
S, Sainsbury JRC, Halcrow P, Chambers P, Farndon JR, Harris AL. Expression
of epidermal growth factor receptor associated with lack of response to
endocrine therapy in recurrent cancer. Lancet 1989; i: 192–185. Poon
MA, et al. Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: evidence of significant
improvement of survival and quality of life in patients with advanced
colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1407–18. Prasad
US, Naylor AR, Walker WS, Lamb D, Cameron EWJ, Walbaum PR. Long term
survival after pulmonary resection for small cell carcinoma of the lung.
Thorax 1989; 44: 784–7. Rothenberg
M, Ling V. Multidrug resistance: molecular biology and clinical relevance.
J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81: 907–9. Sikora
K, Halnan KE. Treatment of cancer. 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall
Medical, 1990. Slevin
ML, et al. A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the
activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7:
1333–40. Steward
WP, et al. Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating
factor (rhGM-CSF) given as daily short infusions—a phase I
dose-toxicity study. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 142–5. Tait
D, Peckham MJ, Hendry F, Goldstran P. Post-chemotherapy surgery in
advanced non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: the significance of histology
with particular reference to differentiated (mature) teratoma. Br J Cancer
1984; 50: 601–9. Tandon
AK, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Chirgwin JM, McGuire WL. Cathepsin D and
prognosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 297–302. Tsuchida
S, Sekine Y, Shineha R, Nishihira T, Sato K. Elevation of the placental
glutathione S-transferase form (GST-&pgr;) in tumour tissues and the
levels in sera of patients with cancer. Cancer Res 1989; 49:
5225–9. Veale
D, Kerr N, Gibson GJ, Harris AL. Characterization of epidermal growth
factor receptor in primary human non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer
Research 1989; 49: 1313–17. Vogelstein
B, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumour development. N Engl
J Med 1988; 319: 525–32. Whang-Peng
J, et al. Specific chromosome defect associated with human small cell lung
cancer: deletion 3p (14–23). Science 1982; 215:
181–2.WHO Handbook for Reporting the Results of Cancer
Treatment. Geneva: WHO Offset Publication No. 48, 1979. |
||||||||||||||||
Back to ZAMEL Topics [Home] [About Us] [e-Library] [Projects] [What's New] [Evaluation] [SEN][Medical Links] [Send Cards][News][Music] |
||||
|